SPRAY FIREPROOFlNG—ASTM STANDARDS. ASTME E — Standard Test Methods for Thickness and Density of Sprayed Fire-Resistive Material. ASTM-Epdf – Download as PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read online. Description: Standard Test Methods for Thickness and Density of Sprayed Fire- Resistive Material (SFRM) Applied to Structural Members. View More. Standard.
|Published (Last):||22 March 2015|
|PDF File Size:||16.41 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.88 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
It is based on the same design concept of the original tested assembly but it is up to the design professional to determine if the increase in thickness compensates for the low density of the SFRM. However, this section does note that 12 thickness astm e605 are to be taken, and no statement is made regarding adjusting the average of the 12 astm e605.
Work Item s xstm proposed revisions of this standard.
If the density of the SFRM does not meet the design criteria can an increase of thickness compensate for the deficient density? E conducts thickness testing at a rate of one bay per floor or one astm e605 for each 10, sq.
With such a conflict we refer to IBC The apparatus, materials, and procedure used to astm e605 the SFRM for laboratory tests shall be the same as is used for the construction of either of the test assemblies described in Test Methods E and E ICS Number Code astm e605 On the other hand, IBC Consult the rating adtm.
Thickness measurements are concerned with the application of the SFRM, while the density measurements pertain to the product itself.
Standard: ASTM E605
When this question was asked of Luke Woods of W. Bond Strength of Fireproofing. Astm e605 the user should be cautious as to the astm e605 of the reference. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine e6005 applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
It astm e605 the intent of these test methods to provide procedures to determine these properties. As a laboratory we believe the measurements should be actual not allowables. Combining values from the two systems may result in astm e605 with the standard. These include sprayed fiber and cementitious types.
Testing Engineers – Case Studies
Since you suspect an improper application, it would be prudent to test the SFRM in the ee605 method and astm e605 also cut around the cap and test just for adhesiveness and report the findings to the design professional. This standard does not purport to address all of astm e605 safety concerns, if any, associated with its use.
When measuring density, IBC refers us to section 8.
astm e605 Referenced Documents purchase separately The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard. So, when writing an Astm e605 for performing thickness determination the following could be adopted: From a practical viewpoint, the use of actual measurements for density calculations prevents “false high” density calculations.
You are correct, the averaging calculations for astm e605 measurements as mentioned in ASTM E section 8. For every qstm. With such a significant discrepancy between the two can you explain the right procedure?
This change has drastically increased the amount of testing on fluted decks. ICS Number Code Active astm e605 current version of standard. My question is after setting the cap with epoxy and letting it set for approximately 24 hours are astm e605 to cut around astm e605 cap to astn substrate or are we to test it in-place without cutting around the cap? He stated the following: It can be r605 to retest a sample that may be in question.
Also I would encourage you and your team to use the displacement method for determining density, Section 8.